Saturday, 20 January 2024

Separate but equal.” Thurgood Marshall chose to go after the root of the evil – the segregation itself – and Brown V. Board

 Content

The response should be at least three well-developed paragraphs. Please include at least one citation from an outside reading to support your analysis. Do not forget to use APA 7 formatting for citations.  

–     –               –             –            

Question 1

In 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that racial segregation laws were constitutional so long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that became known as “separate but equal.” Thurgood Marshall chose to go after the root of the evil – the segregation itself – and Brown V. Board became the law of the land in 1954 determining that separate but equal has no place with “separate educational facilities being inherently unequal.”

Fast forward 64 years. Today, our schools look like Brown v Board of Education never happened. In addition, zero tolerance policies have added to the burdens already placed on certain bodies, leading to what is now being referred to as the “cradle to prison pipeline.”  

Desegregation had provided the ONLY major results regarding the pernicious achievement gap in our nation’s history. During the 1980s – the achievement gap between white students and Black students was cut in HALF.  Once equal opportunity was offered across the board – to better classes, better teachers, better facilities – schools began to produce the results that have not been replicated before or since. “Black Americans who attended schools integrated by court order were more likely to graduate, go on to college, and earn a degree than Black Americans who attended segregated schools. They made more money – five years of integrated schooling increased the earnings of Black adults by 15 percent” (Segregation Now). It was also found that integration improved the lot of all Americans – white students did just as well in integrated schools – but after being a part of an integrated environment – whites were more likely to live in integrated neighborhoods and to send their own children to racially diverse schools.  

What do these statements mean to you – as a student, as a future educator, as a current educator, as a parent or future parent? What does it imply for the building of classroom communities and the ways we engage in curriculum and educational planning? If we are truly better when we learn together – when our classrooms reflect the beautiful diversity that is America – then what has happened to divide us so? Who is to blame and who can change it? How can we change it within our classroom communities?

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Edit 

Backpacks vs. Briefcases" by Laura Bolin Carroll

 https://youtu.be/hLQ-XD3LeH8

THIS VIDEO IS THE SOURCE I WANT TO DO THE RHETORICAL ASSIGNMENT ON. THANK YOU

Intended Audience: Your Classmates.Assignment Description:Post an almost complete draft of your rhetorical situation assignment as a word doc. If the draft is incomplete based on the requirements below, points will be deducted. The draft must be accessible in order to receive points.Then use the questions (below) to do the peer review portion of the assignment for three peers.Your draft must be at least 3/4 complete to earn full credit for this assignment.In order to earn full credit, your draft must contain the Works Cited page in MLA style. The Works Cited page will contain a citation for “Backpacks vs. Briefcases” by Laura Bolin Carroll, your text, and any other class material you referenced. No outside research should be used for this assignment.In order to earn full credit, your draft must contain in-text citations in MLA style for sources used.For the peer review part of the assignment: return to your classmates’ drafts and provide feedback to three classmates by Monday night. This will give your classmates time to apply your suggestions before the final draft is due.Reviewing your peers’ drafts accounts makes up the majority of the grade for this assignment. The grade for this assignment is primarily based on the quality of your answers to the peer review questions. Do not use AI or another source other than yourself to generate the feedback, and make sure the feedback is consistent with the assignment expectations and requirements. While rare, it must be said that evidence of AI-generated feedback in the form of feedback that is inconsistent with the lesson and assignment will result in a 0 for the peer review assignment.Cut and paste the questions and answers into the response box.Peer Review Questions Does the draft have a clear thesis statement that addresses the rhetorical situation of a particular text? Is this statement the last sentence of the introduction? Please make suggestions for improving and shaping this statement or set of statements. Write down some ideas for your classmate to consider.Does the draft have at least a paragraph each addressing the text’s rhetor(s), exigence, audience, and constraints using several examples and evidence from a) the text they’re analyzing and b) the readings in the course?  Make suggestions for improving the development or clarity of these ideas, and/or point out where your classmate should give an example from their text or from “Backpacks vs. Briefcases.”Where can the author expand their ideas and how can they do that?What ideas need more detail or evidence?What ideas or elements of the rhetorical situation need more explanation? What other suggestions can you make for improving the draft?What did you find most valuable about the draft? What did it do well and why?What would you address first? Why? 

Order from Academic Writers Bay